Featured Posts

Using Multiple Calendars in Outlook 2007 Imagine that you use Outlook at work to maintain your work schedule, and Google Calendar at home to keep track of your personal life, and you want to keep the two schedules together, but separate. You...

Readmore

Getting all your QAM channels on Comcast with EyeTV... For Christmas I got an elgato EyeTV Hybrid, and I was excited. I was excited about recording shows (and movies) in HD. I was excited to get rid of the old low-definition DVD recorder. I was excited...

Readmore

Install Windows 7 x64 on a Mac (beat the Select CD-ROM... Having trouble installing Win7 x64 (Windows 7 64-bit) on your mac? Keep getting a Select CD-ROM Boot Type" message when you go to install? Boot Camp have you pulling your hair out? Some googling...

Readmore

File compression primer (With .jpg examples for Adobe... Compression Compression typically looks for patterns and stores references to them. So, imagine you're storing the following text which is 151 characters long: He went to the store.  She bought...

Readmore

  • Prev
  • Next

Max OS X Streaming Video at Fullscreen – Finally!

Posted on : 18-10-2008 | By : Andy | In : fun, tech

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

0

I finally got some satisfaction to a longstanding annoyance today. You see, with Firefox on Windows, you can view webpages in full screen–no taskbar, no chrome, just full view web. On a Mac? No dice. I’m serious, it’s just plain impossible to do…or it was. Some online video services make your browser magically take over the whole screen (like hulu.com), but many don’t. Today, the problem was ESPN360.com.

Given that Apple is totally lame in not giving Safari a fullscreen mode, and that Firefox still hasn’t implemented it yet, I went looking for other solutions. After all, I wanted to watch ESPN360.com on my TV, hooked up to my Mac Mini, and all that chrome was annoying as heck.

So I did some searching once before and found…nothing. Today, somehow I got the Google Query right, or found the right forum, and ended up with megazoomer. That’s right, no more lame zooming tricks (like this), although those are ok for sites that don’t offer a ‘fake’ fullscreen mode.

The only drawback is that this only works for Cocoa apps, so you’ll have to use Safari. :-( The plus is that it works for ANY Cocoa app! Wohoo, no more permanent, unmoveable, unhidable toolbar!

What are you waiting for? Go start watching free online TV in real fullscreen today!

If you have comcast, like me, and thus can’t watch ESPN360 at all…there is a way around it: watch ESPN360 on Comcast.

OS X on not-a-mac. Open computer!

Posted on : 15-04-2008 | By : Andy | In : news, random, tech

Tags: , , , ,

0

So, Apple currently doesn’t offer an (easily) upgradable PC (as in “personal computer”, not “Windows Computer”) that’s affordable to the mainstream. To upgrade a Mac Mini requires a few putty knives, a lot of determination, acute care, and nerves of steel. To upgrade anything else they make (Besides the $2800+ Mac Pro) is pretty much impossible.

Some people don’t like this: after all, why should I have to buy a whole new computer every time I want to add another Hard Drive, or get a faster graphics card? And speaking of graphics cards…why should I have to buy a computer with a built-in monitor (iMac) or shell out nearly $3000 (Mac Pro) if I want to play a 3D shooter or two? Select any $800 windows box, spend $140 on a GFX card, and you’re rocking some decent fun!

Yet, because the EULA on OSX does not allow for installation on hardware that isn’t “Apple-labeled” (whatever that means), no one else can sell computers to install OSX on. And yes, OSX is worth installing.

All of that is (possibly) about to change.

Actually, it most probably will not change, but Psystar is going to try to sell non-Apple computers with OSX Preinstalled. Wait for it, wait for it…

Lawsuit.

Personally, I think this is awesome. Allow other people to enjoy the goodness of OSX without being constrained to a chioce between 5 or 6 different computer models. Let competition do its thing. But, alas, Apple will probably throw a ton of money at the justice system and just out-litigate Psystar. <sigh> As usual, the whole situation can be aptly summed up by Dumb and Dumber:

Lloyd: What do you think the chances are of a guy like you and a girl like me…ending up together?

Mary: Not good.

Lloyd: You mean, not good like one out of a hundred?

Mary: I’d say more like one out of a million.

Lloyd: So you’re telling me there’s a chance. Yeah!

Why does Apple not give a crap about gaming?

Posted on : 24-02-2008 | By : Andy | In : tech

Tags: ,

4

When you buy (or build) a PC, you can slap any CPU, motherboard, or graphics card (assuming some basic level of hardware compatibility) and Windows will work with it. This is one of Windows’ greatest benefits, and biggest weaknesses. The OS has to support every Tom, Dick, and Harry, so it gets pretty bloated.

When you buy a Mac, you can swap out the RAM of your choice, or the HD, but if you want to upgrade your other components you gotta be careful. Steve Jobs likes this, because Mac users don’t upgrade, they replace.

Back to gaming: gamers love to overclock, frequently love to upgrade components, and don’t want to overpay for their components. (They’ll pay a ton of money for the latest graphics cards, but paying an Apple premium for the same stuff would never fly.) They know enough about computers to understand that “Apple” RAM is a ripoff.

So why should Apple care about supporting games? They wouldn’t stand to profit greatly at it, with much lower profit margins to that demographic. Apple makes their money by creating great things you can’t get elsewhere and selling at a hefty profit margin, and jumping in alongside the PC price wars wouldn’t benefit them at all. Furthermore, if you want to game on a Mac these days, you can install Boot Camp and run windows. Then, when you need to upgrade, you can dish out the extra dough for a whole new computer. Happy Apple.