Featured Posts

Using Multiple Calendars in Outlook 2007 Imagine that you use Outlook at work to maintain your work schedule, and Google Calendar at home to keep track of your personal life, and you want to keep the two schedules together, but separate. You...

Readmore

Getting all your QAM channels on Comcast with EyeTV... For Christmas I got an elgato EyeTV Hybrid, and I was excited. I was excited about recording shows (and movies) in HD. I was excited to get rid of the old low-definition DVD recorder. I was excited...

Readmore

Install Windows 7 x64 on a Mac (beat the Select CD-ROM... Having trouble installing Win7 x64 (Windows 7 64-bit) on your mac? Keep getting a Select CD-ROM Boot Type" message when you go to install? Boot Camp have you pulling your hair out? Some googling...

Readmore

File compression primer (With .jpg examples for Adobe... Compression Compression typically looks for patterns and stores references to them. So, imagine you're storing the following text which is 151 characters long: He went to the store.  She bought...

Readmore

  • Prev
  • Next

$695 for a report with misinterpreted data

Posted on : 29-11-2006 | By : Andy | In : tech, work

0

A report over at eMarketer.com begins with a statement and a chart of data that seems a little shocking. (I certainly filter much more than 20% spam!) After a brief glimpse at the chart, it appears that the conclusion being drawn is laughably unsupported.

Check it out: rather than interpreting the Number of messages received versus the type of email received as an average of their surveyed audience, they are drawing conclusions as if the x-axis represented the age of the recipient, and the data the percentage of their inbox. Doing a little math with their paradigm, it appears that people aged 0 are getting 7% business-related material, and a total of only 44% of their mail (what’s up with the missing 56%?) People aged 11-30 (again, with their reasoning) are receiving 158% of their mail. (Maybe they’re stealing from the 0-year-olds)

The scary thing is that this site sells this report as part of a bigger package, and they charge $695 for it! Yes, $695 for flawed conclusions! What it should say is that 41% of people receive 50+ spam emails every week, or something actually supported by the data shown.

I’ve seen typos and other snafus on this site before, but this really takes the cake. Way to go, eMarketer, way to go.

Screenshot here

Write a comment