Featured Posts

Using Multiple Calendars in Outlook 2007 Imagine that you use Outlook at work to maintain your work schedule, and Google Calendar at home to keep track of your personal life, and you want to keep the two schedules together, but separate. You...

Readmore

Getting all your QAM channels on Comcast with EyeTV... For Christmas I got an elgato EyeTV Hybrid, and I was excited. I was excited about recording shows (and movies) in HD. I was excited to get rid of the old low-definition DVD recorder. I was excited...

Readmore

Install Windows 7 x64 on a Mac (beat the Select CD-ROM... Having trouble installing Win7 x64 (Windows 7 64-bit) on your mac? Keep getting a Select CD-ROM Boot Type" message when you go to install? Boot Camp have you pulling your hair out? Some googling...

Readmore

File compression primer (With .jpg examples for Adobe... Compression Compression typically looks for patterns and stores references to them. So, imagine you're storing the following text which is 151 characters long: He went to the store.  She bought...

Readmore

  • Prev
  • Next

Evolution, Creationism, and the Catholic Church

Posted on : 07-11-2005 | By : Andy | In : religion

1

It seems that the Vatican has decided to “embrace science” by supporting the claims of evolution. Their reasoning? That the theory is compatible with the Bible. With a jab at the “fundamentalists” for wanting to “give a scientific meaning to words that had no scientific aim,” he claims that Genesis wasn’t meant to be taken literally, but figuratively.

Why go there? Once the validity of the Bible is undermined, there is no reason to take anything else whatsoever in the Bible as solid truth. You can’t place Peter at the head of the church, (goodbye, Papacy). You can’t even take Jesus seriously. Might as well kiss Christianity goodbye. After all, they could just be nice stories told to say something more vague about God. Please, people.

Read this excerpt from an article I just pulled up about spontaneous generation:

From the time of the ancient Romans, through the Middle Ages, and until the late nineteenth century, it was generally accepted that some life forms arose spontaneously from non-living matter. Such “spontaneous generation” appeared to occur primarily in decaying matter. For example, a seventeenth century recipe for the spontaneous production of mice required placing sweaty underwear and husks of wheat in an open-mouthed jar, then waiting for about 21 days, during which time it was alleged that the sweat from the underwear would penetrate the husks of wheat, changing them into mice. Although such a concept may seem laughable today, it is consistent with the other widely held cultural and religious beliefs of the time.

“Laughable.” Yes, you all nod your heads and agree. Those misinformed people from the middle ages. It’s a good thing science has made such progress so that we don’t have to believe such nonsense. Correction: so we can now consider ourselves enlightened for believing such nonsense.

What!?

That’s right, the fundamental basis to evolution is that life came out of non-life. I don’t have space to debate this here, but here’s a good link to a great exposition of the incredible presuppositions that evolution is based on.

Comments (1)

hmmmm…could this by why my religions professor informed us today that one, very historically backed, perspective about Jesus is that he was a great teacher with an exaggerated sense of self? Hmmm again…who knew that He was pretending! :-0 (lol…thanks for your thoughts…keeps us on our toes!) -Kristin H.

Write a comment